A Call to Arms (Cardinals Style)

by on November 18, 2010 · 2 comments

Let's hope Westbrook's contract isn't fit for Turkey Bowling

 

Within hours of the Cardinals signing Jake Westbrook to a 2 year contract with a mutual option for a 3rd year, much has already been said and written about the deal itself.  If you spend enough time searching the blogosphere, you’ll find that the reactions cover the spectrum, and it’s very much a “Goldie Locks and the Three Bears” scenario.  It’s far too much money.  It’s not really that much money for 2 years.  It’s just right for someone who fits the clubhouse culture.  I’m not here to talk about those things (or the past). *cough**cough* 

Instead, I’m looking at the big picture for both 2011 and 2012.  With the Westbrook deal, the Cardinals have given themselves the option of setting the starting rotation for the next 2 years.  Naturally, there are a lot of relatively big and small “ifs” that will determine whether or not this actually comes to pass.  As usual, the big “ifs” are related to health.  80% of the starting rotation has gone under the knife at some point in recent history, and that doesn’t give me a warm fuzzy feeling as a fan.  Sure, Carpenter and Westbrook held up pretty well last year, but Garcia was shutdown without knowing it, and Lohse was …..well Lohse’d.  As for the small “ifs”, the Cardinals hold options on Wainwright for 2012 and 2013 which can either be triggered by Adam winning the Cy Young in 2011 and staying healthy or by the team choosing to exercise the option years simultaneously.  A slightly larger “if” is the 2012 option on Carpenter which is for $15M with a $1M buyout.  Somewhere in the middle of all that is the no-brainer “if” of Jaime Garcia who is pre-arb3 this year and arbitration eligible after 2011.  If he has a year in 2011 similar to his 2010 season, the Cardinals might want to think about locking him up for a few years and buying out his arbitration years.  

Now that I’ve covered the “ifs”, let’s take a look at the really big $$$ picture.  For a team that projects to a 2011 opening day payroll of just over $100M, the Cardinals have  $41,375,000 invested in 4 starting pitchers, and none of those are named Jaime Garcia.  Jaime is cost-controlled for another year, so his salary should push the total to around $42M for 2011.  That’s roughly 40% of payroll, and I’ve randomly selected “% of payroll” as the comparative value for passing judgment on the “Goldie Locks Pitching Cost Scenario” (yes, I made that up just now).  

Depending on your perspective, that may or may not seem reasonable.  To help provide that perspective, let’s look at what some of the other NL teams are probably going to spend on their rotations for 2011:   

  • Giants -> $38.5M for Lincecum, Zito, & Cain with Bumgarner (pre-arb) & Sanchez (arb1)
  • Phillies -> $54M for Halladay, Hamels, Oswalt, & Blanton
  • Braves -> $30.7M for Hudson, Lowe, & Kawakami with Hanson (pre-arb) & Medlen (pre-arb) & Jurrjens (arb1)
  • Reds -> $11M for Arroyo with Cueto (arb1) and some holes to fill

Oh look, I just happened to choose the 2010 NL playoff teams.  At this time, the baseball-reference.com front page has estimated payroll numbers for each team.  For 2011, the aforementioned teams have respective estimates of $152.5M (Phillies), $96.0M (Braves), $71.2M (Reds), and $103.1M (Giants).  Since there are still many variables left in play (trades, arbitration, non-tenders, and re-signings), it’s difficult to do much more than give “ballpark” estimates here.  Based on the rough numbers, it appears that at least the Giants, Phillies, and Braves will be spending at least 33% of total payroll on starting pitching.  Is the approximate % difference of 7% significant?  Well, I’d have to say “yes”.  I’m just slightly concerned that the Cardinals have strayed outside the “Goldie Locks Zone”, and I hope that they find their way back inside of it soon.  

FYI – That $41,375,000 + Jaime’s pocket change in 2011 potentially becomes $44,375,000 + Jaime’s bigger payday in 2012. 

Like it?  Hate it?  Find me on Twitter and challenge me to some turkey bowling over it!

email
Cardinals fan since I could hold a fishing pole steady. Accidental blogger. Opinionated. I could care less about what you think of me. Constantly confounded, bemused, and confuzzled (ie I'm a pc and a mac). I'm an IT infrastructure analyst with a penchant for breaking tech toys. I ate a sabermetric primer for breakfast. I love playing "All-powerful GM of MLB". The 2010 Cardinals represented a good, practical definition "cognitive dissonance". The 2011 version got by on duct tape and a prayer, and I'm fine with that. They just need new tape for #12 in 12.
View all posts by Dennis
Follow Dennis on Twitter

{ 2 comments }

PH8 November 18, 2010

The second place finish in Cy voting this season has already vested the 2012 and 2013 options. Only way they come back open is if Wainer finishes ’11 on the disabled list.

Dennis November 18, 2010

I was looking at this one closely on Cot’s right before they actually announced the Cy Young results, and the wording has been changed in the last 36 hours for Adam’s entry there. Because there is still an “out” clause, I don’t consider the option years “guaranteed” quite yet. Apparently, the folks at baseball-reference.com don’t either, because they haven’t yet updated the Cardinals’ payroll matrix to show Adam’s “guaranteed” salaries for 2012 and 2013. The other missing piece of information is that his 2012 salary jumps by a cool $1M, if he wins the CY in 2011. This is probably just an academic discussion, because I doubt that they’ll just let him walk.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: