<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cardinal pitchers versus the stolen base</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/2009/02/04/cardinal-pitchers-versus-the-stolen-base/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/2009/02/04/cardinal-pitchers-versus-the-stolen-base/</link>
	<description>An Unofficial St. Louis Cardinals baseball blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:15:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHE</title>
		<link>http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/2009/02/04/cardinal-pitchers-versus-the-stolen-base/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>PHE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 16:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/?p=598#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>Thanks Pip, I consider that to be great praise coming from you.  While my math and proper comparison sometimes struggles, I think the premise is still there.  The Cards are outstanding, both independently and comparatively, against the run.

I&#039;ve reformatted a couple of the charts to make them more intuitive to read, not sure why I didn&#039;t re-sort them before.  Hopefully should be easier to read this way, and give further insight.

I plan to keep tabs on this area of the game in 2009 - and I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll continue to draw on this series of posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Pip, I consider that to be great praise coming from you.  While my math and proper comparison sometimes struggles, I think the premise is still there.  The Cards are outstanding, both independently and comparatively, against the run.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve reformatted a couple of the charts to make them more intuitive to read, not sure why I didn&#8217;t re-sort them before.  Hopefully should be easier to read this way, and give further insight.</p>
<p>I plan to keep tabs on this area of the game in 2009 &#8211; and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll continue to draw on this series of posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pip</title>
		<link>http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/2009/02/04/cardinal-pitchers-versus-the-stolen-base/#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>Pip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/?p=598#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>Wow, great stuff, Nick. Combined with Matthew Leach&#039;s observational/anecdotal evidence of the Cardinals focusing on this aspect of the game, your numbers give very helpful credence. Your research should be referenced for anyone who wants to do a story on the Cardinals&#039; running-game defense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, great stuff, Nick. Combined with Matthew Leach&#8217;s observational/anecdotal evidence of the Cardinals focusing on this aspect of the game, your numbers give very helpful credence. Your research should be referenced for anyone who wants to do a story on the Cardinals&#8217; running-game defense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

