Comments on: No arbitration for Springer, Looper, Isringhausen http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/2008/12/01/no-arbitration-for-springer-looper-isringhausen/ A St. Louis Cardinals blog. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:01:14 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: PHE http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/2008/12/01/no-arbitration-for-springer-looper-isringhausen/#comment-1480 PHE Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:17:39 +0000 http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/?p=464#comment-1480 Yeah, I'm not saying I agree with it - I'm just trying to find *some* reason in what they're doing. Yeah, I’m not saying I agree with it – I’m just trying to find *some* reason in what they’re doing.

]]> By: Cardinal70 http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/2008/12/01/no-arbitration-for-springer-looper-isringhausen/#comment-1474 Cardinal70 Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:51:55 +0000 http://www.pitchershiteighth.com/?p=464#comment-1474 Some sound reasoning, but I'm still not buying that decision. I still believe Loop would get a multi-year deal somewhere and even if he came back, he'd be an asset. Some sound reasoning, but I’m still not buying that decision. I still believe Loop would get a multi-year deal somewhere and even if he came back, he’d be an asset.

]]>